Ask Signal Bureau

Answer Engine

Ask the engine

Ask anything about what we track. You get a clear, honest read grounded in what's actually happening in the news right now — and what would change the answer. The first 15 answers a day are free, no account — a test drive, stated as such; plans lift the cap. For information only, not advice.

Answers are published at an unlisted public link so you can share them (recent ones may appear on this page; stale links expire to a fresh re-ask after ~36 hours). Don’t include personal or confidential information in your question. Privacy & deletion

Try:
WHEN THE QUESTION SUPPORTS IT, A READ CONTAINS
  • Our calibrated read: a % Yes / % No with the reasoning, never a hot take.
  • The evidence: the live headlines, article text, and the desk’s own morning synthesis the read is grounded in, source-checked by a second model.
  • Our read vs. the crowd: the exact matching prediction market's price next to ours — only when a market's terms actually match the question.
  • What would change this: the specific developments that would move the answer.

And when a question is outside what we track — or no market matches its exact terms — the engine says so and abstains from the missing piece rather than faking it.

THIS MORNING’S SYNTHESIS · 2026-07-29

The Iran ceasefire narrative collapsed in 24 hours. $456K of real money drove the probability of a US-Iran ceasefire by July 31 down 35 points to 23%, while oil markets simultaneously repriced downward by 44 points on $52K volume. The crowd is pricing a sustained conflict with no near-term diplomatic breakthrough—and no oil supply shock. BBC reporting on Iran's Strait of Hormuz escalation corroborates the ceasefire collapse, but the oil move suggests traders see the blockade as theater, not a supply threat.

The central gap: oil fell 44 points despite Iran escalation headlines. BBC reports Iran "risking so much over the Strait of Hormuz," Insurance Journal confirms US strikes "from south to north," yet WTI hitting $75 in July dropped from 47% to 3%. The market is pricing Iranian blockade threats as ineffective—either the US has already secured alternative routes, or traders believe the conflict stays contained. If oil breaks back above 20% on real volume while Iran ceasefire stays below 20%, that's a supply-shock repricing worth watching.

US x Iran Effective Ceasefire by July 31 at 23% — the crowd is pricing no diplomatic breakthrough in 48 hours. The picture changes if ceasefire probability climbs back above 40% on another $200K+ of volume, signaling new information on talks. Will WTI Crude Oil hit $75 in July at 3% — the market says no supply disruption despite Iran escalation. Watch for divergence: if this breaks back above 15% while ceasefire stays below 25%, traders are repricing oil-specific risk. U.S. anti-cartel operation outside of the U.S. by July 31 at 43% — probability rising on $117K volume. If this crosses 60% on sustained volume, the crowd is calling escalation the base case.

The crowd is pricing no diplomatic breakthrough before the July 31 deadline. BBC reporting on Iran's Strait of Hormuz escalation aligns with the repricing—this is a sustained conflict bet, not a one-day spike.

Written each morning by the desk from tracked prediction markets and coverage. Informational only.